South Africa Already Picked A Side In The AI Race

The country became a founding member of China's AI organisation in July, announced as science cooperation rather than as the alignment it is.

Sign up for my Substack daily AI newsletter here.

See my AI Training course portfolio for corporate Business Leaders here.

Article link: https://johanosteyn.substack.com/p/south-africa-already-picked-a-side?r=73gqa&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true

Follow me on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/johanosteyn/

The announcement was made. It simply was not made as it was. Read the government’s own account of July’s events, and you will find a warm bilateral meeting about laboratories, astronomy and youth exchange. Read the international coverage of the same week and you will find the opening move in a technological division that Washington is now moving to enforce.

CONTEXT AND BACKGROUND

On 16 July, twenty-nine countries signed an agreement in Shanghai establishing the World Artificial Intelligence Cooperation Organisation, an independent intergovernmental body headquartered there, with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi signing for his government and United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres present. Four days later, the government reported that Science, Technology and Innovation Minister Blade Nzimande had met his Chinese counterpart on the conference sidelines, thanked China for inviting South Africa to the launch of an organisation of which the country is a founding member, and reaffirmed South Africa’s commitment to supporting its operationalisation. The same dispatch covered joint research centres, space science, quantum computing, cybersecurity and a proposed national science museum.

INSIGHT AND ANALYSIS

Nothing in that account is untrue, and nothing in it prepares a reader for August. A draft State Department letter, reported by Reuters and addressed to the 35 signatories of an American AI Opportunity Statement, warns that they cannot hold membership of Washington’s Pax Silica framework alongside a competing initiative, stating that to be part of everything is to be part of nothing, and that signing is not merely a membership subscription but a commitment. The letter never names China, referring instead to duplicative initiatives whose expectations conflict with our own. Pax Silica coordinates supply chains across AI models, semiconductors and critical minerals, and Kazakhstan, the only country known to have joined both frameworks, is reportedly what prompted the draft. A commitment presented domestically as scientific collaboration is being treated internationally as an alignment.

IMPLICATIONS

The gap between those two descriptions is where the risk sits. South African businesses reading their own government’s communication had no reason to understand that a supply chain question had been settled on their behalf, and the country holds strategically significant positions in platinum group metals, manganese and chrome, precisely the resources Pax Silica exists to coordinate. Companies running Chinese network infrastructure alongside American cloud platforms are straddling a division Washington now proposes to close. Whether South Africa is among the 35 recipients is not publicly known, since that list has never been published, which means no local board can currently establish its own exposure. The national AI policy that might have framed any of this was withdrawn earlier in the year.

CLOSING TAKEAWAY

None of this argues that joining was wrong. A body promising to narrow the technology access gap has obvious appeal for a country whose frontier tool costs are dollar-denominated, and non-alignment has been South African policy for three decades. The objection is that a decision with commercial and diplomatic consequences was communicated as a science story, in a dispatch where the organisation appears between quantum computing and a museum proposal. Government should now state which frameworks South Africa has joined, what obligations it understands itself to have accepted, and whether it expects the American letter. Business should ask, because the answer determines the availability of the compute it is already budgeting for.

Johan Steyn is a prominent AI thought leader, speaker, and author with a deep understanding of artificial intelligence’s impact on business and society. He is passionate about ethical AI development and its role in shaping a better future. Find out more about Johan’s work at https://www.aiforbusiness.net