Claude Opus 4.6 and the rise of “delegated work”
- Johan Steyn
- 15 hours ago
- 4 min read
As agent teams take on sequences of tasks, managers must rethink roles, controls, and quality assurance.
Follow me on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/johanosteyn/
Claude Opus 4.6 is being marketed as more than a smarter chatbot. Anthropic is positioning it for multi-step, agentic workflows, where “agent teams” can plan, execute, and coordinate tasks across tools and large bodies of information. That framing matters for business leaders because it shifts the question from “How do we use AI?” to “What work are we willing to delegate, and under what controls?”
This model release week has been treated as a signal that knowledge work is moving from assistance to execution, particularly in legal, finance, and software contexts. The opportunity is obvious: faster cycle times, fewer handovers, and less human time spent on navigation and admin. The risk is just as clear: when the machine starts doing small mistakes can scale quickly.
CONTEXT AND BACKGROUND
Anthropic’s own announcement leans heavily into reliability for longer agentic tasks and a much larger context window, which makes it easier for a model to hold the “shape” of a big job in memory, rather than working in tiny fragments. TechCrunch’s coverage made the same point in practical terms: “agent teams” are designed to take on sequences of work, not just generate a single response.
Reuters framed the broader market reaction bluntly: these upgrades are part of why investors are questioning traditional software models, because an AI layer can increasingly sit above the stack and execute tasks that used to require a human clicking through screens.
Microsoft’s Azure team also moved quickly to position Opus 4.6 for enterprise workflows, which is a reminder that “delegated work” is not theoretical; it is being productised into mainstream enterprise distribution channels.
INSIGHT AND ANALYSIS
Delegated work sounds simple: tell the system what you want, and it does it. In reality, it forces management to define what “done” means. When a person completes a task, we implicitly understand the judgment calls, the context they used, and what they chose not to do. When an agent team completes a task, leaders need explicit rules: which tools can be used, which data can be accessed, which approvals are required, and what evidence must be produced.
This is where quality assurance becomes the new management skill. The risk is not only hallucination, but the model making things up. It is process drift: an agent completes the steps, but in a way that is subtly non-compliant with your policies, your client commitments, or your regulatory obligations. If delegated work becomes common, quality must shift from “review the final output” to “control the workflow”: logging, traceability, and verification checkpoints.
There is also an organisational tension: delegation changes how people learn. In many professions, juniors build judgement by doing the repetitive work before they progress to higher-value decisions. If agent teams absorb the repetitive layer, leaders must redesign training so people still understand how the work is meant to be done, not only how to supervise it. Otherwise, you end up with fast output and fragile competence.
Finally, trust is not a feeling; it is a system. Anthropic itself has been publishing risk material about more capable models and the need to think seriously about misuse and failure modes. Business leaders do not need to become AI researchers, but they do need to become more disciplined about controls when autonomy increases.
IMPLICATIONS
Start with a delegation framework. Classify tasks by impact and reversibility. Low-impact, reversible work (drafting internal summaries, first-pass analysis) can be delegated with light review. High-impact, hard-to-reverse work (financial approvals, HR decisions, customer commitments, regulatory submissions) should require human sign-off and strong evidence trails.
Build controls into the operating model, not into a policy document. Require audit logs of tool use, sources consulted, and steps taken. Put approval gates in front of irreversible actions. Create escalation routes when outputs are uncertain or inconsistent. And insist on a fallback plan: when the agent fails, who takes over, and how?
Measure quality like you would measure any operational process. Track error rates, rework, time saved, and incident patterns. If you cannot measure it, you cannot manage it, and delegated work will become delegated risk.
CLOSING TAKEAWAY
Claude Opus 4.6 is a useful moment for leaders because it highlights a shift that is already underway: AI is moving from helping people do tasks to doing parts of the tasks itself. That is not the end of work, but it is the start of a new kind of management. The winners will not be the organisations with the most enthusiastic pilots. They will be the organisations that define clear boundaries, build auditable workflows, train people to supervise intelligently, and treat delegated work as an operational system that must earn trust every day.
Author Bio: Johan Steyn is a prominent AI thought leader, speaker, and author with a deep understanding of artificial intelligence’s impact on business and society. He is passionate about ethical AI development and its role in shaping a better future. Find out more about Johan’s work at https://www.aiforbusiness.net